The Vibrational Holographic Field and Subjective Consciousness: A Resonance Perspective

Abstract

The Resonance Theory of Consciousness (RTC) offers a novel framework for understanding how subjective experience arises from physical processes, specifically through interactions with a Vibrational Holographic Field. This article explores RTC, visualizing its key components using Bloch sphere representations. We focus on how perception and experience, as faculties of consciousness, shape our awareness by collapsing dynamic resonance patterns within this field into stable perceptual images. A core aspect of our discussion involves the visualization of this collapse as a cube within a modulated Bloch sphere, offering a quantum-inspired metaphor for the emergence of subjective experience from a fundamental vibratory reality. We discuss how this framework offers a compelling approach to the Hard Problem of Consciousness.

Keywords

Vibrational Holographic Field, Resonance, Experience, Perception, Bloch Sphere, Qubit State

Introduction

The “hard problem of consciousness” (Chalmers, 1995), concerning how subjective experience arises from objective physical processes, persists as a central challenge. The Resonance Theory of Consciousness (RTC) provides a unique perspective by proposing that consciousness emerges not solely from brain activity, but through interactions with a foundational Vibrational Holographic Field (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). This field is characterized by dynamic resonance patterns that encode potential conscious experiences. In RTC, perception and experience act as key faculties of consciousness that shape our awareness. This article explores this framework through two primary visualizations: a Holographic Vibrational Field on a Bloch Sphere (Figure 1) and a Collapsed Qubit State visualized as a Cube within that Field (Figure 2). We discuss how these figures, inspired by quantum mechanics and holographic principles (Pribram, 1991), demonstrate a departure from traditional materialism and offer a potential pathway towards understanding the emergence of subjective experience.

Theory: The Vibrational Holographic Field and Faculties of Consciousness

Central to RTC is the concept of a Vibrational Holographic Field (VHF) as the fundamental ontological reality. This field possesses an intrinsic internal order that is linked to consciousness (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). Drawing from holographic principles, the VHF is dynamic, oscillatory, and encodes information about the whole within each part (Pribram, 1991). Within this field, RTC identifies two key faculties of consciousness: perception and experience.

Figure 1: Holographic Vibrational Field on Bloch Sphere

The Bloch sphere (see Figure 1) provides a powerful visualization of the VHF.

• The Sphere Itself: The Bloch sphere typically represents the state space of a qubit (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014). Here, it symbolizes the VHF – a fundamental substrate of reality.
• Surface Oscillations and Modulations: The R-code-generated surface oscillations and sinusoidal modulations visualize the dynamic and continuous wave patterns within the VHF. These patterns, while not directly perceivable, are the foundation upon which consciousness operates.

library(plotly)

# Generate base Bloch sphere coordinates
theta <- seq(0, 2*pi, length.out=150)
phi <- seq(0, pi, length.out=150)
grid <- expand.grid(theta=theta, phi=phi)

# Add vibrational field modulation (standing wave pattern)
wave_amplitude <- 0.15
vibrational_field <- wave_amplitude * 
  sin(6*grid$theta) * cos(4*grid$phi)  # Combined theta/phi modulation

# Convert to Cartesian coordinates with vibrational modulation
x <- (1 + vibrational_field) * sin(grid$phi) * cos(grid$theta)
y <- (1 + vibrational_field) * sin(grid$phi) * sin(grid$theta)
z <- (1 + vibrational_field) * cos(grid$phi)

# Create color scale based on vibrational intensity
color_scale <- colorRamp(c("navyblue", "cyan", "red"))
colors <- color_scale((vibrational_field + wave_amplitude)/(2*wave_amplitude))
colors <- rgb(colors[,1], colors[,2], colors[,3], maxColorValue=255)

# Create 3D surface plot with vibrations
fig <- plot_ly(x = ~x, y = ~y, z = ~z, 
               type = "mesh3d",
               intensity = ~vibrational_field,
               vertexcolor = colors,
               opacity = 0.6,
               colorscale = list(c(0,0.5,1), c("navyblue", "cyan", "red"))) |> 
  layout(scene = list(
    aspectmode = "cube",
    xaxis = list(title = "X", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    yaxis = list(title = "Y", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    zaxis = list(title = "Z", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    camera = list(eye = list(x=1.5, y=1.5, z=0.8))
  )) |> 
  colorbar(title = "Vibrational Intensity")

# Add quantum state vector components
fig <- fig |>
  add_trace(
    type = "cone",
    x = c(0, 0, 0),
    y = c(0, 0, 0),
    z = c(0, 0, 0),
    u = c(1.2, 0, 0),
    v = c(0, 1.2, 0),
    w = c(0, 0, 1.2),
    colorscale = list(c(0,1), c("gray", "gray")),
    showscale = FALSE
  )

fig

Figure 1: Holographic Vibrational Field on Bloch Sphere

The Faculties of Subjective Consciousness

Perception: Collapsing Resonance into Static Images

In RTC, perception functions to collapse dynamic resonance wave patterns within the VHF into static images. The brain, understood as an electromagnetic device (McFadden, 2020), generates its own wave patterns that interfere with those of the VHF. The resulting resonance patterns exist within both the external VHF and its internal order. This internal order enables consciousness to function, providing the framework for interacting with and interpreting the resonance patterns. Perception collapses these dynamic patterns into immediate, localized representations. Critically, in RTC, these static images don’t reside within the brain but within both aspects (external and internal) of the holographic field itself. Perception isn’t passive reception; it’s an active collapsing of vibrational dynamics into stable forms.

Experience: The Integral of Perception

While perception yields static images, experience goes further, acting as:

• The integral of perception, synthesizing individual perceptual moments into a broader, cohesive awareness (Tononi, 2008).
• The differential of resonance wave patterns, arising from changes and variations within the underlying dynamics of the VHF.

Experience therefore forms a continuous flow that connects perception with the broader, internal dynamics of the VHF. It enables consciousness to integrate discrete perceptual moments into a unified sense of awareness over time (Northoff, 2016).

Figure 2: Holographic Vibrational Field with Collapsed Qubit State (Cube)

This figure (see Figure 2) directly visualizes the collapse process. The cube represents a collapsed quantum state – a localized “form” emerging from the broader VHF. * The Cube as Collapsed State: The cube represents the “static image” formed through perception, where a range of dynamic potentials within the VHF are collapsed into a definite perceptual object. The collapse transforms these dynamic resonance patterns into stable forms (static images). * Connection to Quantum Mechanics: The cube is a visual analogue to wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics, where an observer’s act of measurement forces a system from a superposition of states into a definite state. * Vibrational Intensity The surface and volume of the sphere represent the Vibrational field, in which there are greater amplitudes of vibrations (red) and lesser amplitude of vibrations (blue).

library(plotly)

# Generate base Bloch sphere coordinates
theta <- seq(0, 2*pi, length.out=150)
phi <- seq(0, pi, length.out=150)
grid <- expand.grid(theta=theta, phi=phi)

# Add vibrational field modulation (standing wave pattern)
wave_amplitude <- 0.15
vibrational_field <- wave_amplitude * 
  sin(6*grid$theta) * cos(4*grid$phi)  # Combined theta/phi modulation

# Convert to Cartesian coordinates with vibrational modulation
x <- (1 + vibrational_field) * sin(grid$phi) * cos(grid$theta)
y <- (1 + vibrational_field) * sin(grid$phi) * sin(grid$theta)
z <- (1 + vibrational_field) * cos(grid$phi)

# Create color scale based on vibrational intensity
color_scale <- colorRamp(c("navyblue", "cyan", "red"))
colors <- color_scale((vibrational_field + wave_amplitude)/(2*wave_amplitude))
colors <- rgb(colors[,1], colors[,2], colors[,3], maxColorValue=255)

# Create 3D surface plot with vibrations
fig <- plot_ly(x = ~x, y = ~y, z = ~z, 
               type = "mesh3d",
               intensity = ~vibrational_field,
               vertexcolor = colors,
               opacity = 0.6,
               colorscale = list(c(0,0.5,1), c("navyblue", "cyan", "red"))) |> 
  layout(scene = list(
    aspectmode = "cube",
    xaxis = list(title = "X", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    yaxis = list(title = "Y", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    zaxis = list(title = "Z", range = c(-1.5,1.5)),
    camera = list(eye = list(x=1.5, y=1.5, z=0.8))
  )) |> 
  colorbar(title = "Vibrational Intensity")

# Add collapsed state as a cube inside the sphere
cube_vertices <- data.frame(
  x = c(-0.3, 0.3, 0.3, -0.3, -0.3, 0.3, 0.3, -0.3),
  y = c(-0.3, -0.3, 0.3, 0.3, -0.3, -0.3, 0.3, 0.3),
  z = c(-0.3, -0.3, -0.3, -0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3)
)

cube_faces <- list(
  c(1,2,6,5), # Bottom face
  c(2,3,7,6), # Front face
  c(4,3,7,8), # Top face
  c(1,4,8,5), # Back face
  c(1,2,3,4), # Left face
  c(5,6,7,8)  # Right face
)

for (face in cube_faces) {
  fig <- fig |> 
    add_trace(
      x = cube_vertices$x[face],
      y = cube_vertices$y[face],
      z = cube_vertices$z[face],
      type = "scatter3d",
      mode = "lines",
      line = list(color="black", width=4)
    )
}

# Add quantum state vector components for context
fig <- fig |> 
  add_trace(
    type = "cone",
    x = c(0),
    y = c(0),
    z = c(0),
    u = c(1),
    v = c(1),
    w = c(1),
    colorscale=list(c(0,"gray"),c("gray")),
    showscale=FALSE)

fig

Figure 2: Holographic Vibrational Field with Collapsed Qubit State (Cube)

Discussion: RTC and the Hard Problem

The RTC, as visualized through the Bloch sphere models, offers a compelling approach to the hard problem of consciousness, which is fundamentally about explaining how physical processes give rise to subjective experience.

• Qualia and the VHF: RTC locates the basis for qualia directly within the Vibrational Holographic Field (VHF) and its inherent internal order. The dynamic activity and structure of the VHF are not merely physical phenomena, but are intrinsically linked to potential conscious experiences (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). The modulations and oscillations within the sphere visualized in Figure 1 can be interpreted as encoding a range of potential qualia. Thus, qualia aren’t merely emergent but are inherent aspects of the VHF itself.

• The Explanatory Gap and the Collapse of Perception: The traditional “explanatory gap” refers to the difficulty in logically deducing subjective experience from objective physical facts. RTC addresses this gap by emphasizing the role of perception in transforming the VHF’s dynamic vibrational patterns into stable, consciously accessible forms. Perception collapses these dynamic resonance patterns into static images—immediate and localized representations of reality. This process is visualized in Figure 2, where the cube symbolizes a collapsed quantum state – a definite perceptual object emerging from a field of possibilities. Thus, subjective experience arises from the collapsing of the vibratory field.

• The Role of Experience in Creating Integration: The experience is understood as to the continuous integration of a cohesive awareness. It may be related to the brain’s ability to create a “global workspace” (Baars, 2005). The integration of this internal order suggests a connection that brings about that specific experience. The integration of those vibratory states, therefore, is how we experience existence.

• Transcending Materialism: RTC challenges purely materialistic views by suggesting that consciousness isn’t simply an emergent epiphenomenon of neural processing, but that consciousness has a fundamental place in the cosmos, thus providing a dualistic view of mind and consciousness: the material and the vibratory aspect.

Conclusion

The Resonance Theory of Consciousness (RTC), through visualizations such as the Holographic Vibrational Field and the Collapsed Qubit State on the Bloch Sphere, provides a framework that allows a connection with subjective conscious. Through emphasizing the role of the faculties of experience and perception in shaping our awareness RTC offers a compelling new approach to the hard problem by. As the study and theorizing go further, this provides new avenues for understanding the relationship between the physical world and subjective experience.

Future research efforts should be directed towards developing methods for validating the existence and properties of the Vibrational Holographic Field. A key focus should be the creation of detailed mathematical models that describe how the brain-generated electromagnetic fields interact with it. These efforts may bring us closer to a better integrated understanding of consciousness, by the continuous probing and evolving process of the research.

References

Baars, B. J. (2005). Global workspace theory of consciousness: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of human uniqueness. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 45-53.

Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.

Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002

Hunt, T., & Schooler, J. (2019). The easy part of the hard problem: A resonance theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26(1-2), 8-51.

McFadden, J. (2020). Integrating information in the brain’s EM field: The cemi field theory of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2020(1), niaa016. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa016

Northoff, G. (2016). Minding the brain: A guide to neuroscience and the mind. Springer.

Pribram, K. H. (1991). Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216-242.

References

Abe, Masao & Ives, C. (Translators). (1990). Kitarõ Nishida: An Inquiry into the Good. Yale University Press.

Abrol, M. (2023). Mapping the notions of the self and the world in the works of Henri Bergson and Nishida Kitarō. Bergsoniana, 3(July 2023). https://doi.org/10.4000/bergsoniana.1204

Albarracin, M., Pitliya, R. J., Ramstead, M. J. D., & Yoshimi, J. (2023). Mapping Husserlian Phenomenology onto Active Inference. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1721 CCIS, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28719-0_7

Bagby, J. R. (2021). Reconstructing Bergson’s Critique of Intensive Magnitude. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 52(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1806688

Bergson, H. (1910b). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. George Allen & Unwin LTD.

Bergson, H. (1910a). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Pantianos Classics.

Bergson, H. (1911). Matter and Memory. George Allen & Unwin LTD.

Bergson, H. (1922a). Creative Evolution. Macmillan; Co.

Bergson, H. (1922b). Duration and simultaneity: with reference to Einstein’s theory. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, INC.

Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and Memory. Zone Books.

Bergson, H. (1999). Duration and Simultaneity. Bergson and the Einsteinian Universe. Clinamen Press.

Bond, R. J., & Keane, W. J. (2007). An Introduction to Abstract Mathematics. Waveland Press, INC. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Brough, J. (1972). The emergence of an absolute consciousness in Husserl’s early writings on time-consciousness. Georgetown University. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248638

Bunnag, A. (2017). Buddhist Causality and Henri Bergson’s ’Duration’: A Defense from Theravada Buddhist Viewpoint. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3097160

Bunnag, A. (2019). The concept of time in philosophy: A comparative study between Theravada Buddhist and Henri Bergson’s concept of time from Thai philosophers’ perspectives. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.007

Campo, A. (2023). Henri Bergson’s complete mysticism and Kitaro Nishida’s energetism: a case of common intuition. Bergsoniana, 3(July 2023). https://doi.org/10.4000/bergsoniana.1316

Dolciani, Berman, & Freilich. (1965). Modern Algebra: Structure and Method. Nook 1. Houghton Miffin.

Freiwald, R. C. (2014). Introduction to Set Theory and Topology. Washington University. https://doi.org/10.2307/3613583

Fujita, M. (2013). On the idea of ‘ basho’ in the philosophy of Kitarō Nishida. Ethos: Quarterly of the John Paul II Institute at the Catholic University of Lublin and the John Paul II Foundation, 4(104), 65–77.

Gelūnas, A. (2001). “Pure Experience” and the Problem of Order in the Early Philosophy of Nishida Kitarō. Acta Orientalia Vilnensia, 2(1990). https://doi.org/10.15388/aov.2001.18347

Hammack, R. (2018). Book of Proof (3rd edition). Richard Hammack.

Higaki, T., & Aames, J. (Translator). (2020). Nishida Kitarõ’s Philosophy of Life. Mimesis International.

Kitaro, N. (2012). The unsolved issue of consciousness. Philosophy East and West, 62(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2012.0013

Kitaro, N., Viglielmo, V. H. (Translator)., Takeuchi Toshinori (Translator), & O’Leary, J. S. (Translator). (1987). Intuition and Reflection in Self-Consciousness. State University of New York Press.

Kitarõ, N., Viglielmo, Y. H. with T. Y., & (Translators), J. S. O. (2020). Intuition and Reflection in Self-Consciousness. Chisokudõ Publications.

Kleiner, J. (2020a). Mathematical models of consciousness. Entropy, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/E22060609

Kleiner, J. (2020b). Mathematical models of consciousness. Entropy, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/E22060609

Kleiner, J., & Ludwig, T. (2024). What is a mathematical structure of conscious experience? Synthese, 203(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04503-4

Kraus, E. M. (1998). The Metaphysics of Experience: A Companion to Whitehead’s Process and Reality American Philosophy Series, 1073-2764. Fordham University Press.

Krummel, J. W. M., & Nagatomo, S. (Translators). (2012). Place & Dialect: Two Essays by Nishida Kitaro (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1011.1669v3

Lundy, C. (2018). Bergson’s Method of Problematisation and the Pursuit of Metaphysical Precision. Angelaki, 23(3), 31–44.

Massey, H. (2015). The Origin of Time: Heidegger and Bergson. SUNY Press. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rce/article/download/1659/1508%0Ahttp://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/1348%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500799708666915%5Cnhttps://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Educa

MEMORY, P. (2020a). Henri Bergson: Time and Free Will (chapter by chapter guide pt. 1). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyM89tnW1Uk

MEMORY, P. (2020b). Henri Bergson: Time and Free Will (chapter by chapter guide pt. 2). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMpuee3LLvw

MEMORY, P. (2020c). Henri Bergson: Time and Free Will (chapter by chapter guide pt.3, final video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdqKV1C43f0

MEMORY, P. (2021). Intro to Matter and Memory: Henri Bergson’s Theory of the External Image. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLmvc6p5CB4&t=72s

Millspaugh, R. P. (2018). Elementary Set Theory. Open Educational Resources, 7. https://doi.org/10.31356/oers007

Miranker, W. L., & Zuckerman, G. J. (2009). Mathematical foundations of consciousness. Journal of Applied Logic, 7(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2008.05.002

Nishida, K. (1987). The Logic of Topos and the Religious Worldview. The Eastern Buddhist, 20(2), 93–96.

Nishida, K., & Dilworth, D. A. (Translator). (1987). Last Writings: Nothingness and the Religious Worldview. University of Hawaii Press. http://www.amazon.com/Last-Writings-Nothingness-Religious-Worldview/dp/0824815548%3FSubscriptionId%3D0NM5T5X751JWT17C4GG2%26tag%3Dsonnysoftware%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0824815548

Rahim, F. A. (2014). Axioms of Set Theory and Equivalents of Axiom of Choice.

Resende, P. (2022). Qualia as physical measurements: a mathematical model of qualia and pure concepts. 1–20. http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10602

Robbins, S. E. (2000). Bergson, perception and Gibson. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(5), 23–45.

Robbins, S. E. (2006). On the Possibility of Direct Memory. In In v.w. Fallio (ed.) new developments in consciousness research (pp. 1–64). Nova Science.

Robbins, S. E. (2011). On the possibility of direct memory. Perspectives in Psychiatry Research, 2000, 77–140.

Robbins, S. E. (2013). Form, Qualia and time: The hard problem reformed. Mind and Matter, 11(2), 153–181.

Robbins, S. E. (2015). Bergson, Gibson and the Image of the External World (pp. 1–23). Fidelity Information Services.

Robbins, S. E. (2017a). Bergson’s Holographic Theory - 1 - The image of the external world Title. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtuxTXEhj3A

Robbins, S. E. (2017b). Bergson’s Holographic Theory - 2 - J. J. Gibson, invariance, events. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EascxD6coJk

Robbins, S. E. (2017c). Bergson’s Holographic Theory - 3 - Time, scales, subject and object. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0326lMlhmf0

Robbins, S. E. (2017d). Bergson’s Holographic Theory - 4 - memory, 4d being, recall. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5ajYxeBZn8

Robbins, S. E. (2020). Is Experience Stored in the Brain? A Current Model of Memory and the Temporal Metaphysic of Bergson. Axiomathes, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-020-09483-x

Robbins, S. E. (2023). Gibson and Time: The Temporal Framework of Direct Perception. Ecological Psychology, February. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2023.2170234

Robert Schinzinger (Translator). (1958). Kitaro Nishida Intelligibility and the Philosophy of Nothingness: Three Philosophical Essays. East-West Center Press. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Shibata, M. (n.d.). The Diary of a Zen Layman: The Philosopher Nishida Kitarō.

Signorelli, C. M., Wang, Q., & Khan, I. (2021). A compositional model of consciousness based on consciousness-only. Entropy, 23(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030308

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2024). Nishida Kitarō. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nishida-kitaro/

Törnquist, A., & Mammen, J. (2023). Set Theory and A Model of the Mind in Psychology. Review of Symbolic Logic, 16(4), 1233–1259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020322000107

Vermeiren, F. (2021). Bergson and Intensive Magnitude: Dismantling His Critique. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 52(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1754131

Vermeiren, F. (2022). Bergson and the Kantian Concept of Intensive Magnitude. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2021.1910854

Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Science and the Modern World. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. Giffors Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh During the Session 1927-28. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.